A New Universal Income Tax
We propose consolidating an array of separate levies into a single, streamlined tax. This would replace:
This new Universal Income Tax would be levied simply on all forms of income. For the purpose of this system, income is defined straightforwardly as any net increase in money.
Note on Supplemental Taxes: A few specific taxes would remain, but they would be limited to user-pays models for specific services (e.g., Road Tax) or punitive levies designed to discourage harmful behaviors (e.g., duties on fuel, alcohol, and tobacco).
1. The Taxation of Money
Under this system, only money is taxable, and tax can only be paid in money.
2. The Taxation of Assets
Assets will not incur tax directly. Tax is only triggered when asset value is realized or made liquid—whether through sale, transfer, or borrowing against the asset to raise capital.
3. The Personalised Non-Taxable Allowance
The standard tax-free personal allowance would remain but be set at a level which covers the essential living expenses for an individual which would be regularly reviewed and set according to clearly defined rules. Essential expenses cover housing, energy, food, clothing, and investments.
Personalised component:-
Fixed component:-
The personalised component would not be automatically applied and need to be claimed by the individual. In the case of a couple living together only one of them would be paying the mortgage or rent and warrant the personalised component for that. The housing component is an amount that reflects what might be considered a minimum amount needed to afford a reasonable standard of housing not the actual amount paid.
This personalized allowance would be converted into a tax code, seamlessly integrating with the current payroll architecture. Citizens would be assigned a conservative default tax code unless they provide the necessary evidence to claim a higher personalized allowance.
4. Progressive Taxation Structure
To raise sufficient revenue, reflect true financial capability, and maintain public consent, the Universal Income Tax must be progressive. To avoid arbitrary "cliff-edges," progression is calculated as an increasing percentage based on multiples of the individual's personalized non-taxable allowance (a):
The following is just to illustrate the concept:-
5. Implementation
Recognising the risks of a complete overhaul of taxation it is reasonable to expect any implementation to need to be introduced in stages. For example:-
5.1 Align Capital Gains with Income Tax
This would raise more revenue and the basic rate of income tax could be reduced or tax free allowance increased.
5.2 Abolish inheritance tax
Treating inheritance as income would mean more would be raised and tax rate could be reduced further.
5.3 Roll other taxes into income tax
Eventually, the move to merge all taxes into one will mean increasing the tax rate to compensate.
Some people will probably need to pay more than they would under the old system (eg. somebody currently not paying council tax) and the rates would need to be increased gradually to avoid shock.
With this in mind the additional revenue of previous changes would not initially be entirely passed on in tax reductions.
Download Summary Leaflet